Tags: Social Science Research Proposal TemplateEuthanasia Term PaperBtec National Business Coursework HelpPersonal Fitness Business PlanBlank Essay OutlineEssay Contest 2014Outlines For Global Warming Research PapersCover Letter Office Administrator UkResearch Papers On Signal ProcessingIt Business Continuity Plan Example
Everything that makes one happy, and a happy life should most definitely be lived whether its examined or not.Epicurus’ philosophy on happiness, is composed of three things; good companionship (friends), having freedom (being self-sufficient and free from everyday life and politics) and an analysed life (meaning to have time and space to think things through).
Epicurus and Socrates have different approaches to the phrase “analysing life”.
Epicurus would advise not to spend money as temporary relief for a bad day but rather take time out and reflect and contemplate. Epicurus believes that analysing your life is one third of what it takes to have a happy life whereas Socrates believes that if you are not constantly reviewing and examining every aspect of your life just so you can get the best out of it, it’s not worth living in general.
Socrates seemed to overlook other factors that account to our happiness and give worth to our lives.
In disagreement with Socrates; We all must contemplate now and again but only to a certain extent, as it can be disastrous to overthink and reconsider every aspect of our life.
Upon being put to death for teaching false doctrines and corrupting the youth of Athens.
Socrates said something before being put to death that would eventually be known as one of the most illustrious quotes throughout philosophy, which would seem to echo into the generations to come.Hence Socrates’ renowned statement “The unexamined life is not worth living”.Declaring that humans must scrutinize their lives in order to live a fulfilled one isn’t agreeable to any extent.Socrates believed over analysing and examining our lives would lead to better ones, whereas De Montaigne would advise us to spend less time over-analysing and overthinking things as it leads to insecurities that we are all far better off without.Socrates statement “The unexamined life is not worth living”, is an exaggeration and is predominantly false but does have a degree of truth to it.De Montaigne was one of the most significant philosophers of the French Renaissance and is best known for his skepticism.De Montaigne would’ve had an advancing degree of doubt and disagreement on Socrates’ statement that “the unexamined life is not worth living”.Socrates’ statement does instigate discussion, but it doesn’t necessarily apply to everyone’s way of life and what makes or doesn’t make their life worth living.The theory that all lives that are unexamined don’t have a purpose and should not be lived is unreasonable and simply not true.When one reads and is able to contrast Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" it clearly shows a great and perhaps the most clear example of the point that Socrates was attempting to make to the jury, in the "Apology".For example in Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", Plato makes the reader visualize a cave where there are a great number of prisoners who are restrained and are faced staring at the wall where all they can see is shadow movements that are projected from a fire that is placed right behind these prisoners, and this fire is displaying false images from what appears to be images of the outside world.