Tags: Jorge Luis Borges Autobiographical EssayCritical Thinking Lesson PlanStickley Furniture EssayCase Study Leadership Change ManagementCollege Research Paper SampleThe House Of Seven Gables Ap Essay
He had previously called for changing the Second Amendment to permit gun control. In his essay published Tuesday, Stevens talks about the “March for Our Lives” events on Saturday which drew crowds in cities across the country.
" President Trump tweeted in response to retired Justice John Paul Stevens's op-ed in the New York Times calling on Americans to rid the Constitution of our right to bear arms.
Supreme Court justice to repeal the Second Amendment has President Donald Trump saying "no way" as he hopes to make a solidly conservative court the lasting legacy of his time in office."The Second Amendment will never be repealed!
More recently, liberal activists started a group called Guns Down after the 2016 Pulse nightclub massacre in Orlando to promote a more aggressive political and policy campaign against firearms.
The new players in the gun-control advocacy space have not, however, dramatically widened the scope of proposals to reduce gun violence.
The amendment then has to be approved by three quarters of the states.
Asked at a White House briefing whether President Donald Trump had any reaction to Stevens’ comments, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the president and administration “still fully support the Second Amendment.”“We think that the focus has to remain on removing weapons from dangerous individuals, not on blocking all Americans from their constitutional rights,” she said.Repealing the amendment would be extremely difficult.An amendment to the Constitution can only be proposed either by Congress with a two thirds vote in both houses or by a constitutional convention called for by two thirds of the state legislatures.Stevens is calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment to allow for significant gun control legislation.The 97-year-old Stevens says in an essay on The New York Times website that repeal would weaken the National Rifle Association's ability to "block constructive gun control legislation." (AP Photo)FILE - In this April 30, 2014, file photo, retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens testifies on the ever-increasing amount of money spent on elections as he appears before the Senate Rules Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington.But now gun rights advocates are saying "go ahead, make my day" to Stevens's latest call."The only reason why you'd want to repeal the Second Amendment is to enact a massive confiscation of already existing guns," Professor Josh Blackman of South Texas College of Law said."That would be a bad idea and would likely embolden gun rights supporters more than help facilitate the debate."Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and his fellow Democrats have no interest in supporting a move that would give the NRA what he said it wants."It is not a binary choice.It is not simply protect the Second Amendment or your guns get taken away," Schumer said."There's a middle ground, which is what America pleads for."In fact, for the measures the March for Our Lives students support—universal background checks and assault weapons bans—the biggest obstacle is partisan politics, not the Second Amendment, at least for now."If President Trump can replace Justice Ginsburg, they may actually shift the Second Amendment jurisprudence to the right and perhaps other laws may actually be struck down," Blackman said.But in the interest of pragmatism, that’s about as far as the gun-control movement will go.Congress hasn’t passed a significant gun-control measure since the Brady Bill nearly a quarter-century ago, and a major element of that law—a ban on so-called assault weapons—lapsed in 2004.