This section requires critical interpretation by the author such that the review adds value to existing literature.It should bring out ideas/hypotheses that can explain any discrepancies and provide solutions to existing problems.In this sense, it essentially forms the first experiment of any research project.Tags: Nurse EssayGreeting Card Business PlanCollege Admissions Essay ExamplesHow To Introduce An EssayCheap Paper Bags With HandlesMemorial Day EssayHigh School Essay One-Page
Many researchers struggle when it comes to writing literature review for their research paper.
A literature review is a comprehensive overview of all the knowledge available on a specific topic till date.
Georgakopoulos and Thomson (2008) use the first four paragraphs of the article, "Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context" to explain their influences, approach (grounded theory and the arena concept) and the debates that informed their research design.
In "The normative imperatives of business and marketing strategy: grounding strategy in resource-advantage theory", Hunt and Derozier (2004) summarize the various theories of optimizing strategic performance: "…
It should be a critical and analytical summary of the selected literature that guides the readers through the central theme of the research.
Body is normally used for describing the different themes under the main topic by dividing them into different subheadings.
On the other hand, systematic reviews follow a well-planned methodology to qualitatively or quantitatively analyze a defined number of studies.
They usually focus on a single question and have clear study objectives that are worked upon in a systematic manner.
These studies are based on a well-defined strategy unlike narrative reviews.
Systematic reviews and narrative reviews are organized slightly differently.