Tags: Senior Care Business PlanSeven Step Problem Solving ModelAccess Courses For Social WorkSmall Company Business PlanEssay Writing My TeacherSmoking Ban ThesisCritical Thinking LearningThesis Defense DevelopmentDetention AssignmentsViolent Video Games Essay
Wait one day, wait one week, wait one month, we'll stay back and see.An indecisiveness for something which might not exist within one's lifetime would make a claim for which things ought to be reversible or decisions ought to be remade in order for things to be "controlled" in a manner.
In addition, these resources could be re-allocated to further the research of the specific disease the patient is suffering in order to allow future generations to either not have the disease or increase the quality level of care for future patients of this disease by alleviating the symptoms of the disease at the very least.
In addition, if the patient is an organ donator and the organs are healthy, it may save up several lives which are ultimately invaluable.
In this respect, of the practice of "Euthanasia", death is the ultimate goal of avoidance and thus a finalized decision of upholding pain until the very last minute of life in respect to waiting for a treatment outweighs the ultimate outcome of death.
The opposition makes a claim that reversibility of a decision that may be regretted later due to it being finalized is better on these grounds, however, if life was controllable in all aspects and under all possible circumstances, we were able to scroll back on our decisions, what meaningful would arise out of the circumstances for which our decisions are made on?
Long term palliative care for the terminally ill is a huge and ultimately wasteful drain on medical resources.
Why waste these precious resources on someone who has expressed a desire to die, when they could be improving the life of someone who wants to live?Also, even if a cure was possible, what complications will arise thereafter?What if the patient is of old age and will die anyways but has already lived a long healthy life?If a terminal patient faces a long, slow, painful death, surely it is much kinder to spare them this kind of suffering and allow them to end their life comfortably.Pain medications used to allieviate symptoms often have unpleasant side effects or may leave the patient in a state of sedation.A person who undergoes euthanasia is usually terminally ill.Euthanasia can be carried out either by doing something, such as administering a lethal injection, or by not doing something necessary to keep the person alive (for example failing to keep their feeding tube going).Some can be cared for at home, or in special hospices.If we stopped caring for the terminally ill at all where would we draw the line?It cannot be justified to deem that waiting for something which might or might not exist in a future to occur outweighs the prospect of pain.Wait for a miracle "cure", wait for a revolutionary science "discovery" to solve our problems, wait for a technological "innovation"..line of thought may be wise in some situations but not necessarily in the case of Euthanasia.