Some difficulties, however, and some additional expense would attend the execution of it.Some deviations, therefore, from the principle must be admitted.
Let's also take a look at how the system of checks and balances works with something common, like passing a law.
One of the powers that the legislative branch has is the ability to propose laws. Supreme Court, in the judicial branch, can also declare a law unconstitutional, which also cancels the law - another check.
However, each branch also has, within its abilities, 'checks' that limit or prevent other branches from becoming too influential. Each of the sections would also have its own separate powers: the legislative branch creates laws, the executive branch enforces laws, and the judicial branch interprets laws.
This was done so that no one branch would become too dominant.
In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.
A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.” Madison also discusses the way republican government can serve as a check on the power of factions, and the tyranny of the majority. all authority in it will be derived from and dependent on the society, the society itself will be broken into so many parts, interests, and classes of citizens, that the rights of individuals, or of the minority, will be in little danger from interested combinations of the majority.” All of the Constitution’s checks and balances, Madison concludes, serve to preserve liberty by ensuring justice.If men were angels, no government would be necessary.If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.In a general sense, think of the system of checks and balances like playing a game of basketball.There are coaches that tell the players what to do, much like the president does in the executive branch.Without presuming to undertake a full development of this important idea, I will hazard a few general observations, which may perhaps place it in a clearer light, and enable us to form a more correct judgment of the principles and structure of the government planned by the convention.In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others.Secondly, there are the referees that make judgments to see if something is right or wrong, like the judicial branch.There are also the rules that are agreed upon and must be followed, much like the laws that the legislative branch passes.Try it risk-free Anytime you have ever played a game, there has most likely been a set of rules that control how the game is played. The rules tell each player what he or she can and cannot do so that the game is played fairly and that no one player has a bigger advantage than another to win. federal government is bound by to make sure that no one branch of the government becomes too powerful is called the system of checks and balances.Just like there are rules when we play games, the branches of the U. federal government have a set of rules they must follow. In other words, each branch of the government is 'balanced' because each branch has its own set of authoritative functions and responsibilities. government as we know it today was first being formed, the founders of the Constitution thought it was best if the government was divided into three sections, or branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.